لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and the importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.
A survey of PACER end users, conducted in 2021, measured consumer satisfaction and determined areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts is using the survey results to evaluate and prioritize potential changes to PACER services and capabilities.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
The explained recovery could possibly be used, with the most, for corroboration with the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as almost nothing was discovered due to these pointation. The place of incidence together with the place of throwing the dead body were already while in the knowledge of witnesses just before their pointation through the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere here to your tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in implementing the regulation. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases listened to from the state court, for the same level.
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is proven and the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the different penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is not adequate though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful way. Read more
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected into the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration through the Court under Article 184 (3), has been setting a precedent which allows for much less complicated access into the public to method the superior courts and the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence plus the separation of powers.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally recognized conviction. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system is just not without flaws: overhauling is overdue as well as legislation regarding murder involves significant reconsideration and clarification. To the time being, the minimum that can be achieved is to make certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.